thenatureofthewomb:

allupanja:

something-like-joy:

diebywwe:

Heath Ledger winning an Oscar for ‘Best Supporting Actor’ for his role as ‘The Joker’ in The Dark Knight (2008)

will forever reblog this

always reblog, no matter what.

This hurts

Wow, just look at everyone’s faces

(Source: youreinnewy0rktoday)

you-are-another-me:

“A friend took this pic in Arizona USA. The meteorologists don’t have a name for it. 
Seems to be high energy to be in a Rainbow and a tornado! ”

 

pug-of-tea:

entercamelot:

the night bloggers have arrived….but this time with a point.

(Source: robotindisguise)

tyleroakley:

nextyearsgirl:

The laws in the Old Testament were set forth by God as the rules the Hebrews needed to follow in order to be righteous, to atone for the sin of Adam and Eve and to be able to get into Heaven. That is also why they were required to make sacrifices, because it was part of the appeasement for Original Sin.

According to Christian theology, when Jesus came from Heaven, it was for the express purpose of sacrificing himself on the cross so that our sins may be forgiven. His sacrifice was supposed to be the ultimate act that would free us from the former laws and regulations and allow us to enter Heaven by acting in his image. That is why he said “it is finished” when he died on the cross. That is why Christians don’t have to circumcise their sons (God’s covenant with Jacob), that is why they don’t have to perform animal sacrifice, or grow out their forelocks, or follow any of the other laws of Leviticus.

When you quote Leviticus as God’s law and say they are rules we must follow because they are what God or Jesus wants us to do, what you are really saying, as a Christian, is that Christ’s sacrifice on the cross was invalid. He died in vain because you believe we are still beholden to the old laws. That is what you, a self-professed good Christian, are saying to your God and his son, that their plan for your salvation wasn’t good enough for you.

So maybe actually read the thing before you start quoting it, because the implications of your actions go a lot deeper than you think.

-An atheist who understands Christian theology better than Bible-thumpers do.

(Source: drunkonstephen)

awesome-pictures-awesome:

The pendulum in the Physics Department stopped working…

fullcabs:

fuck

(Source: aimlessme)

Just a pool, disguised as a pond, with a trampoline instead of a diving board.

I wrote a paper about these kinds of pools several years ago for a class when they were just prototypes. These pools have a natural filtration system that run based on the plants that are in the pool that give the water nutrients that allow it to not only be crystal clear, but you are also able to drink the water because it becomes so clean. And the best part is that once the initial filtration system is installed and calibrated, it maintains itself and eliminates the need for chlorine or constant maintenance like salt water pools. 

(Source: wikingvinning)

f-l-e-u-r-d-e-l-y-s:

Liquid Sculptures: Powerful Waves Photographed by Pierre Carreau Seem Frozen in Time

Landscape Photography by Michael Eastman

Photographer Pierre Carreau was born in 1972 near Paris surrounded by a family of artists including a photographer, painter and sculptor, all of which would influence his creative upbringing as well as his artistic output. As a child he was always fascinated by the manifestation of waves and the diversity of color, shape, and size found in each of them. Some of his first photography projects involved work for surfing magazines and water sport equipment manufacturers.

Carreau’s work has now moved into fine art as he shoots waves with a variety of high speed cameras using various macro and wide angle lenses, capturing water shapes that appear more sculptural than liquid. These are truly some of the most remarkable wave photos I’ve ever seen and you can see many, many more over on his website. He also has a number of fine art prints available over at Clic Gallery

 on May 2, 2013 • 

skeptikhaleesi:

Some interesting info: This is very reminiscent of the Baby X experiments, in which it was discovered that people reacted differently to a baby’s behavior depending on whether or not they believed the baby to be male or female.  People were asked to watch a video of a baby reacting to a startling image (a Jack-in-the-box popping up), and describe the baby’s emotional state.  When people believed the baby to be female, they described the baby as being scared and upset; when they thought the baby was male, they perceived the baby to be angry.  This was very telling, as it showed that literally identical behavior could be construed differently based on the perceived gender of the subject.

jensensations:

Ryan Gosling won’t eat his cereal (x)

cthulhu-with-a-fez:

shadowsofwho:

Not mine. I just wanted to have them together and in order.

this is glorious

bvsedjesus:

teenage-beautyy:

karz4kidz:

bittergrapes:

faeiouck:

MY SISTER JUFT SHOEWED ME THIS AND I CAN”T STOP FREAKIN ABOUT IT

LIKE THIS GIRL IS A FUCKIN DEMON OR SOMEIHTGN

JUST WATCH IT

I have lost faith in physics

what on this fucking earth

holy fucking shit

but can she do it on the dick tho?

(Source: jourdonnais)

(Source: miguellguerreiro)